| Superstitious people are fond of the relicks of saints and holy men, for the same reason that they seek after types and images, in order to enliven their devotion, and give them a more intimate and strong conception of those exemplary lives, which they desire to imitate. |
| Now it is evident, one of the best relicks a devotee coued procure, would be the handywork of a saint; and if his cloaths and furniture are ever to be considered in this light, it is because they were once at his disposal, and were moved and affected by him; in which respect they are to be considered as imperfect effects, and as connected with him by a shorter chain of consequences than any of those, from which we learn the reality of his existence. |
| This phaenomenon clearly proves, that a present impression with a relation of causation may, inliven any idea, and consequently produce belief or assent, according to the precedent definition of it. |
| But why need we seek for other arguments to prove, that a present impression with a relation or transition of the fancy may inliven any idea, when this very instance of our reasonings from cause and effect will alone suffice to that purpose? It is certain we must have an idea of every matter of fact, which we believe. |
| It is certain, that this idea arises only from a relation to a present impression. |
| It is certain, that the belief super-adds nothing to the idea, but only changes our manner of conceiving it, and renders it more strong and lively. |
| The present conclusion concerning the influence of relation is the immediate consequence of all these steps; and every step appears to me sure end infallible. |
| There enters nothing into this operation of the mind but a present impression, a lively idea, and a relation or association in the fancy betwixt the impression and idea; so that there can be no suspicion of mistake. |
| In order to put this whole affair in a fuller light, let us consider it as a question in natural philosophy, which we must determine by experience and observation. |
| I suppose there is an object presented, from which I draw a certain conclusion, and form to myself ideas, which I am said to believe or assent to. |
| Here it is evident, that however that object, which is present to my senses, and that other, whose existence I infer by reasoning, may be thought to influence each other by their particular powers or qualities; yet as the phenomenon of belief, which we at present examine, is merely internal, these powers and qualities, being entirely unknown, can have no hand in producing it. |
| It is the present impression, which is to be considered as the true and real cause of the idea, and of the belief which attends it. |
| We must therefore endeavour to discover by experiments the particular qualities, by which it is enabled to produce so extraordinary an effect. |
| First then I observe, that the present impression has not this effect by its own proper power and efficacy, and when considered alone, as a single perception, limited to the present moment. |
| I find, that an impression, from which, on its first appearance, I can draw no conclusion, may afterwards become the foundation of belief, when I have had experience of its usual consequences. |
| We must in every case have observed the same impression in past instances, and have found it to be constantly conjoined with some other impression. |
| This is confirmed by such a multitude of experiments, that it admits not of the smallest doubt. |
| From a second observation I conclude, that the belief, which attends the present impression, and is produced by a number of past impressions and conjunctions; that this belief, I say, arises immediately, without any new operation of the reason or imagination. |
| Of this I can be certain, because I never am conscious of any such operation, and find nothing in the subject, on which it can be founded. |
| Now as we call every thing CUSTOM, which proceeds from a past repetition, without any new reasoning or conclusion, we-may establish it as a certain truth, that all the belief, which follows upon any present impression, is derived solely from that origin. |
| When we are accustomed to see two impressions conjoined together, the appearance or idea of the one immediately carries us to the idea of the other. |